<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overall impressions of free speech symposium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novascotiascott.com/2008/11/01/overall-impressions-of-free-speech-symposium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novascotiascott.com/2008/11/01/overall-impressions-of-free-speech-symposium/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:35:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pesky Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.novascotiascott.com/2008/11/01/overall-impressions-of-free-speech-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Pesky Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 11:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novascotiascott.com/?p=797#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Ezra Levant&#039;s speaking style may have been viewed as &quot;objectionable&quot; by many panel members, but I&#039;ve noticed that Canadian human rights defenders of the white persuasion tend to also be terribly &quot;whitebread Anglo types&quot; as well. This was true during the time I spent working in the &quot;race relations&quot; arena in the mid-1980s to the later 1990s. These people&#039;s objections to Levant&#039;s style as more cultural and social (snobbery) than they are genuinely substantial. 

Forthright and frank communications styles are ALWAYS labeled &quot;objectionable&quot; by the leftist elite whitebread Anglo Canadians nurtured on the art of not identifying the elephant in the room. How else to explain the mess that English Canada&#039;s elite has nurtured over the years?

There was a time when Canada&#039;s dilemma was one of &quot;TWO SOLITUDES&quot;. The Anglo Canadian, flaccid reaction response to that dilemma? Well, rather than &quot;bridging&quot; the solitudes, Anglo Canadians went multicultural. 

Now Canada HAS SO MANY SOLITUDES that we can&#039;t count them anymore. Canada is adrift in a miasma of identity politics that has made the country virtually ungovernable. Frankly, it&#039;s all very depressing, and I&#039;m glad to have a way out. 

There was a time when I loved my country more than I pitied it. That time is long gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ezra Levant&#8217;s speaking style may have been viewed as &#8220;objectionable&#8221; by many panel members, but I&#8217;ve noticed that Canadian human rights defenders of the white persuasion tend to also be terribly &#8220;whitebread Anglo types&#8221; as well. This was true during the time I spent working in the &#8220;race relations&#8221; arena in the mid-1980s to the later 1990s. These people&#8217;s objections to Levant&#8217;s style as more cultural and social (snobbery) than they are genuinely substantial. </p>
<p>Forthright and frank communications styles are ALWAYS labeled &#8220;objectionable&#8221; by the leftist elite whitebread Anglo Canadians nurtured on the art of not identifying the elephant in the room. How else to explain the mess that English Canada&#8217;s elite has nurtured over the years?</p>
<p>There was a time when Canada&#8217;s dilemma was one of &#8220;TWO SOLITUDES&#8221;. The Anglo Canadian, flaccid reaction response to that dilemma? Well, rather than &#8220;bridging&#8221; the solitudes, Anglo Canadians went multicultural. </p>
<p>Now Canada HAS SO MANY SOLITUDES that we can&#8217;t count them anymore. Canada is adrift in a miasma of identity politics that has made the country virtually ungovernable. Frankly, it&#8217;s all very depressing, and I&#8217;m glad to have a way out. </p>
<p>There was a time when I loved my country more than I pitied it. That time is long gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steynian 278 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</title>
		<link>http://www.novascotiascott.com/2008/11/01/overall-impressions-of-free-speech-symposium/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Steynian 278 &#171; Free Canuckistan!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novascotiascott.com/?p=797#comment-231</guid>
		<description>[...] GEEZER BOUFFONT BOY&#8211; Overall impressions of free speech symposium, or &#8220;Ezra: riveting and dynamic!&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GEEZER BOUFFONT BOY&#8211; Overall impressions of free speech symposium, or &#8220;Ezra: riveting and dynamic!&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.392 seconds -->
