<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nova Scotia Scott &#187; Hazel Blears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.novascotiascott.com/tag/hazel-blears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.novascotiascott.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 16:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UK cabinet minister: Blogs don’t allow &#8220;new voices&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.novascotiascott.com/2008/11/07/uk-cabinet-minister-blogs-dont-allow-new-voices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.novascotiascott.com/2008/11/07/uk-cabinet-minister-blogs-dont-allow-new-voices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gilbreath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media and Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Folly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazel Blears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.novascotiascott.com/?p=998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hazel Blears, “communities secretary” in Britain&#8217;s Labour government, says something monumentally stupid about political blogs. &#8220;Until political blogging &#8216;adds value&#8217; to our political culture, by allowing new voices, ideas and legitimate protest and challenge, and until the mainstream media reports politics in a calmer, more responsible manner, it will continue to fuel a culture of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hazelblears.co.uk/" target="_blank">Hazel Blears</a>, “communities secretary” in Britain&#8217;s Labour government, says something monumentally <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/labour/3384974/Political-blogs-create-culture-of-cynicism-says-Hazel-Blears.html" target="_blank">stupid about political blogs</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Until political blogging &#8216;adds value&#8217; to our political culture, by allowing new voices, ideas and legitimate protest and challenge, and until the mainstream media reports politics in a calmer, more responsible manner, it will continue to fuel a culture of cynicism and despair.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What nonsense!  The most appealing aspect of blogging, of course, is that it’s open to anyone.  The blogosphere is far more democratic than the Labour cabinet room.</p>
<p>She also claims that political blogs emit negative vibes.</p>
<blockquote><p>[B]logs are mostly written by &#8220;people with disdain for the political system and politicians&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think she&#8217;s confusing criticism of government actions with &#8220;disdain&#8221; for politics.  Political blogs are often started by people whose views are disdained by politicians and the mainstream media.   As <a href="http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/" target="_blank">Kate McMillan says</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Why this blog?</strong> Until this moment I have been forced to listen while media and politicians alike have told me &#8220;what Canadians think&#8221;. In all that time they never once asked.</p>
<p>This is just the voice of an ordinary Canadian yelling back at the radio &#8211; <strong>&#8220;You don&#8217;t speak for me.&#8221;</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Ms Blears trots out the time-honoured complaint of governing parties everywhere: The press don’t give us no respect.</p>
<blockquote><p>The MP says too much commentary is provided by a self-appointed political class that leaves &#8220;ordinary people&#8221; excluded and the mainstream media must adopt a &#8220;more responsible manner&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>There’s that “responsible journalism” thing again.  Where have we <a href="http://www.novascotiascott.com/2008/11/03/john-miller-the-saga-of-khurrum-awan/" target="_blank">heard that before</a> recently?</p>
<p>I bet she&#8217;s just angry because she recently <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1048296/Blears-falls-prey-Google-bomb-Attack-Of-The-50-inch-Woman.html" target="_blank">fell victim</a> to a <a href="http://heady.co.uk/rm/hazel_blears_harriet_harman.jpg" target="_blank">Google Bomb</a>.</p>
<p>h/t: <a href="http://www.debatableland.com/the_debatable_land/2008/11/bloggers-ministers.html" target="_blank">The Debatable Society</a> and <a href="http://overlawyered.com/2008/11/microblog-2008-11-06/" target="_blank">Overlawyered</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.novascotiascott.com/2008/11/07/uk-cabinet-minister-blogs-dont-allow-new-voices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

